Kinderhook Plates
Back to Mormon Quotes Index
“I have seen 6 brass
plates ... covered with ancient characters of
language containing from 30 to 40 on each side of the plates.
Prest. J. [Joseph Smith, Jr.] has translated a portion and says they
contain the history of the person with whom they were found and he was
a descendent of Ham through the loins of Pharaoh King of Egypt, and
that he received his Kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.”
-
William Clayton, Joseph Smith, Jr.’s secretary, William
Clayton’s Journal,
May 1, 1843, as quoted in Trials of
Discipleship – The Story of William Clayton, a Mormon, p. 117
“I insert fac-similes
of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook...
I have translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history
of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of
Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, King of Egypt, and that he received
his Kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.”
-
Prophet Joseph Smith, Jr., History of the Church,
v. 5, p. 372
“Six plates having the
appearance of Brass have lately been dug out of
the mound by a gentleman in Pike C. [County] Illinois. They are
small and filled with engravings in Egyptian language and contain the
genealogy of one of the ancient Jaredite back to Ham the son of Noah.”
-
Apostle Parley P. Pratt, as quoted in Ensign,
Aug. 1981, p. 73
“Why does the
circumstance of the plates recently found in a mound in
Pike County, Ill., by Mr. Wiley, together with the ethnology and a
thousand other things, go to prove the Book of Mormon true? – Ans.
[Answer] Because it is true!”
- Times and Seasons, v. 5, p. 406
“The new work which
Jo. Is about to issue as a translation of these
[Kinderhook] plates will be nothing more nor less than a sequel to the
Book of Mormon...”
- Warsaw Signal, May 22, 1844
“The contents of the
plates, together with a Facsimile of the same,
will be published in the ‘Times and Seasons,’ as soon as the
translation is completed.”
- The Nauvoo Neighbor, June 1843
“The time has come to
admit that the Kinderhook plate incident of 1843
was a light-hearted, heavy-handed, frontier-style prank, or ‘joke’ as
the perpetrators themselves called it.”
-
Stanley P. Kimball, Mormon scholar, The Mormon
Association Newsletter, June 1981
“A recent electronic
and chemical analysis of a metal plate... brought
in 1843 to the Prophet Joseph Smith... appears to solve a previously
unanswered question in Church history, helping to further evidence that
the plate is what its producers later said it was – a
nineteenth-century attempt to lure Joseph Smith into making a
translation of ancient-looking characters that had been etched into the
plates.... As a result of these tests, we concluded that the
plate... is not of ancient origin.... the plate was etched with acid;
and as Paul Cheesman and other scholars have pointed out, ancient
inhabitants would probably have engraved the plates rather than etched
them with acid. Secondly, we concluded that the plate was made
from a true brass alloy (copper and zinc) typical of the mid nineteenth
century: whereas the ‘brass’ of ancient times was actually bronze, an
alloy of copper and tin.”
-
Stanley P. Kimball, Mormon scholar, The Ensign,
Aug. 1981, pp. 66-70
“I received your
letter in regard to those plates, and will say in
answer that they are a humbug, gotten up by Robert Wiley, Bridge
Whitten and myself.... We read in Pratt’s prophecy that ‘Truth is
yet to spring out of the earth.’ We concluded to prove the
prophecy by way of a joke.”
- W.
Fugate, as quoted in The Kinderhook Plates,
by Welby W. Ricks, reprinted in the Improvement Era, Sept. 1962
“What does it all add
up to? Does it merely mean that one of the
‘finds’ which the Latter-day Saints believed supported the Book of
Mormon does not support it, and that there is no real blow dealt to the
prophetship of Joseph Smith? Not at all, for as Charles A. Shook
well observed – in a personal letter to the author – ‘Only a bogus
prophet translates bogus plates.’ Where we can check up on Smith
as a translator of plates, he is found guilty of deception. How
can we trust him with reference to his claims about the Book of
Mormon? If we cannot trust him where we can check him, we cannot
trust him where we cannot check his translation... Smith tried to
deceive people into thinking that he had translated some of the
plates. The plates had no such message as Smith claimed that they
had. Smith is thus shown to be willing to deceive people into
thinking that he had power to do something that could not be done.”
-
James D. Bales, The Book of Mormon?, pp.
98-99
“The dimensions,
tolerances, composition and workmanship are consistent
with the facsimiles of an 1843 blacksmith shop and with the fraud
stories of the original participants.”
-
George Lawrence, Mormon physicist, “Report of a
Physical Study of the Kinderhook Plate Number 5”
“A recent rediscovery
of one of the Kinderhook plates which was
examined by Joseph Smith, Jun., reaffirms his prophetic calling and
reveals the false statements made by one of the finders....
“The plates are now
back in their original category of
genuine.... Joseph Smith, Jun., stands as a true prophet and
translator of ancient records by divine means and all the world is
invited to investigate the truth which has sprung out of the earth not
only of the Kinderhook plates, but of the Book of Mormon as well.”
-
Welby W. Ricks, President of BYU Archaeological
Society, quoted in Kinderhook
Plates
“... I was present
with a number at or near Kinderhook and helped to
dig at the time the plates were found... I ... made an honest affidavit
to the same... since that time, Bridge Whitten said to me that he cut
and prepared the plates and he... and R. Wiley engraved them
themselves.... Wilburn Fugit appeared to be chief, with R. Wiley
and B. Whitten.”
-
James D. Bales, The Book of Mormon?, pp.
95-96