- ALA Library Fact Sheet Number 20
- a selected list of articles, books, and web sites covering the
subject of combined and joint-use libraries
- covers the two most common types of combined libraries: public
libraries combined with school library media centers and public
libraries combined with academic libraries
- Libraries must consider changes in both policy and technology to
remain relevant to the next generation of students
- By Robert H. McDonald and Chuck Thomas
Joint-use libraries
- Anne Pusey will lead us in a consideration of joint-use public
libraries. To prepare yourselves for the session, read:
- Required:
- Optional:
- Questions to Consider:
- What is lost in joint-use arrangements?
- What is gained?
- What other creative partnerships/collaborations could public
libraries benefit from?
Technology and user expectations
- Kenneth Alford will lead the discussion on technology and user
expectations. To prepare yourselves for the session, read:
-
Household Use of public Libraries and Large Bookstores -
Hemmeter
- A study on interchangeability and competition between
libraries and bookstores
- Feel free to skip the procedures section (599-605)
-
The Participation Divide - Hargittai & Walejko
- Does access to computers spawn web 2.0 use?
- Read (2-5) and (9-16)
- Click
First, Ask Questions Later - Goodman
- A concise overview on YA internet use.
-
Switch Your Search Engine - Notess
- A reference librarians advice on internet searching.
-
The Continual Evolution of Web Platforms - Secured Lender;
Nov/Dec2007
- What users are looking for in an online application
- Article begins in the middle of the page.
- The first two readings are the driest and longest.
- Things to think about while reading:
- Is competition with bookstores a reason to adopt or avoid the
"bookstore model" for public libraries?
- What can we (as librarians) do to encourage our patrons to use
Web 2.0 features?
- What do we do about the differences in the way different user
groups actually "use"' the internet?
- "YA tend to have their
technology use studied more often than any other user group."
What are the implications of that statement for a public library
trying to create policies and programs?