School
of Information and Library Science
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
INLS 881/882, Research
Issues and Questions I & II
Fall 2009 & Spring 2010
Schedule
Skip to current
session
Session 1: August 25, Introductions; Scope of ILS; Being a doctoral student
What are your current interests? What does it mean to pursue those interests as a doctoral student? What subjects and approaches characterize information and library
science?
- Shera, J.H. (1968). An epistemological foundation for library science. In Montgomery, E.B. (ed.), The Foundations of Access to Knowledge: A Symposium. Syracuse University, 7-25. [SILS reserves - BD161 .F6; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Heilprin, L.B. (1968). Response [to Shera]. In Montgomery, E.B. (ed.), The Foundations of Access to Knowledge: A Symposium. Syracuse University, 26-35. [SILS reserves - BD161 .F6; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,
50(12), 1051-1063. [UNC
libraries]
- More...
Session 2: September 1, Scope of ILS, continued; Reading and writing in ILS; Literature reviews
What subjects and approaches characterize information and library
science? What are the important research questions in informaiton and library science today?
What is a literature review? Why are they important for researchers? How do I find and analyze the literature that's most pertinent to my research questions? How do I write up what I've learned, and get it published?
- Bates, M. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050. [UNC libraries]
- Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. [UNC libraries]
- Webster, J., & Watson, R. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. [UNC libraries]
- Lunenburg, F.C., & Irby, B.J. (2008). Writing the literature review [and] Synthesizing the literature. In Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 142-164. [SILS reserves - LB2369 .L814 2008; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- More...
Session 3: September 8, Two critical aspects of scholarly work: theory and methods
What is theory, and why do researchers use/need theory? What methods are used in ILS research, and why?
- Case, D.O. (2007). Theories (section 7.2), [and] Sources of theory in information seeking (section 7.3). In Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 145-151 and 173-190. [SILS reserves - ZA3075 .C36 2002; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Case, D.O. (2007). The research process (Chapter 8). In Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 145-151 and 173-190. [SILS reserves - ZA3075 .C36 2002; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Truex, D., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2006). Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research. Journal of the AIS, 7(12), 797-821. [UNC libraries]
- Thompson, K.M. (2009). Remembering Elfreda Chatman: A champion of theory development in library and information science education. Journal of Ecuation for Library and Information Science, 50(2), 119-126. [UNC libraries]
- More...
Session 4: September 15, Creation of knowledge; The scholarly publication process
The information life cycle begins when someone records their current knowledge. These information objects are of great interest to information professionals, and their later use is affected by how they are created and recorded. They are also the means by which scholars' work can have an impact, and so may be viewed as an indicator of scholarly productivity.
- Ashford, S. J. B. (1996). The publishing process: The struggle for meaning. In Frost, P., & Taylor, M. S. (eds.), Rhythms of Academic Life: Personal Accounts of Careers in Academia. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 119-127. [SILS reserves - LB1778.2 .R59 1996; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Birnholtz, J.P. (2006). What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(13), 1758-1770. [UNC libraries]
- Shaw, D., & Vaughan, L. (2008). Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a "typical professor". Library & Information Science Research, 30(1), 47-55. [UNC libraries]
- Lane, N. (2008). US science and technology: An uncoordinated system that seems to work. Technology in Society, 30(3-4), 248-263. [UNC libraries]
- More...
Session 5: September 22, Preservation: personal and cultural
- Smith, A. (2007). Valuing preservation. Library Trends, 56(1), 4-25. [UNC libraries]
- Marshall, C.C. (2008). From writing and analysis to the repository: Taking the scholars' perspective on scholarly archiving. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 251-260. [ACM Digital Library]
- Dumais, S., Cutrell, E., Cadiz, J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., & Robbins, D.C. (2003). Stuff I've seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 72-79. [ACM Digital Library]
- Lee, C. (2007). A talk on digital preservation. UNC-CH/YouTube Information in Life Series. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHy9CW_vMp4&feature=PlayList&p=19189F4C412A6E09&index=1.
- More...
Session 6: September 29, Representing/describing knowledge objects so they can be retrieved
Information/knowledge objects may exist, but they are not useful unless the person needing them can discover them. One important role of the information professional is to represent and organize information/knowledge objects in ways that support effective information retrieval.
- Brachman, R.J., & Levesque, H.J. (2004). Section 1.1, The key concepts: Knowledge, representation, and reasoning. In Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann, 2-4. [SILS reserves - Q387 .B73 2004; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- O'Connor, B.C., Kearns, J., & Anderson, R.L. (2008). Definition of terms. In Doing Things with Information: Beyond Indexing and Abstracting. Libraries Unlimited, 7-15. [SILS reserves - ZA3075 .O28 2008; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- O'Connor, B.C., Kearns, J., & Anderson, R.L. (2008). Considerations of representation. In Doing Things with Information: Beyond Indexing and Abstracting. Libraries Unlimited, 21-44. [SILS reserves - ZA3075 .O28 2008; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Hjørland, B. (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(8), 1519-1536. [UNC libraries]
- More...
Session 7: October 6, Organizing knowledge objects so they can be retrieved; Personal information management
In addition to describing individual knowledge objects, information professionals develop schemes (including semantic frameworks, ontologies, etc.) to organize collections (both personal and organizational) of objects.
- Hjørland, B. (2008). What is knowledge organization? Knowledge Organization, 35(2/3), 86-101. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52(3), 515-540. [UNC libraries]
- Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., & Berners-Lee, T. (2006). The semantic Web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(3), 96-101. [UNC libraries]
- Listen to: Schachter, J., Butterfield, S., Wales, J., & Shirky, C. (2005). Folksonomy: How I learned to stop worrying and love the mess. Panel discussion from ETech 2005. (35 minutes). [http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail464.html]
- Jones, W. (2007). How people keep and organize their information. In Jones, W., & Teevan, J. (eds.), Personal Information Management. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pages 35-56. [SILS reserves - HD30.2 .P472 2007; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- More...
- Interview reports: Deborah Barreau (Alex), Richard Marciano (Alex, Mike B.), Reagan Moore (Mike B.), Arcot Rajasekar (Mike B.)
Session
8: October 13, Interest group presentations/discussions
Each interest group will be invited to present a summary of what they've learned. Assigned readings will be selected by the interest groups.
- 2:00-2:25, Mike B., Sheryl, & Felix: Browsing, Affect, and Design
- 2:25-2:50, Mike G., Maurice, & Jason: Ontologies of Scholarly Argument
- Reading to support the presentation:
- Benn, N., Buckingham Shum, S., Domingue, J., & Mancini, C. (2008). Ontological foundations for scholarly debate mapping technology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. http://oro.open.ac.uk/11939/.
- 2:50-3:15, Alex & Kaitlin, Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects
- Readings to support the presentation:
- Day, M. (2004). Preservation metadata (prepublication draft). In Gorman, G.E., & Dorner, D.G. (eds.), Metadata Applications and Management: International Yearbook of Library and Information Management,
2003–2004. London: Facet Publishing, 253–273. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/publications/iylim-2003/.
- Lavoie, B., & Dempsey, L. (2004, July/August). Thirteen ways of looking at ...
Digital preservation. D-Lib Magazine, 10(7/8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2004-lavoie.
- 3:30-3:55, Bonus presentation: Portnoy, F. and Madhavan, P., (2009). Using persistence display to enhance change detection in process control graphical gauges. The 53rd Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Antonio, TX, USA. PDF.
- 3:55-4:30, Continuing discussion of PIM (from Oct 6)
Session 9: October 20, Information retrieval systems
Information retrieval systems provide access to recorded information/knowledge objects. The design and evaluation of such systems is a core area of research in ILS.
- Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley. [SILS reserves - Z667 .B34 1999]
- Chapter 1, Introduction, 1-18 [Available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Croft, W.B., Metzler, D., & Strohman, T. (2010). Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Boston: Addison Wesley. [SILS reserves - TK5105.884 .C765 2010; assigned chapters available in Resources: Class Readings on class Sakai site]
- Chapter 1, Search engines and information retrieval, p1-12
- Chapter 2, Architecture of a search engine, p13-30
- Kekalainen, J., & Jarvelin, K. (2002). Evaluating information retrieval systems under the challenges of interaction and multidimensional dynamic relevance. Proceedings of the 4th CoLIS Conference, 252-270. [http://www.info.uta.fi/tutkimus/fire/archive/JK05.pdf]
- Callan, J., Allan, J., Clarke, C.L.A., Dumais, S., Evans, D.A., Sanderson, M., & Zhai, C.X. (2007). Meeting of the MINDS: An information retrieval research agenda. SIGIR Forum, 41(2), 25-34. [ACM Digital Library]
- More...
Session 10: October 27, Interactive information retrieval
- Belkin, N.J. (1990). The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science: Principles and Practice, 16(1), 11-15. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Belkin, N.J. (1993). Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In Information retrieval '93. Von der Modellierung zur Anwendung. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, 55-66. [Available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Ingwersen, P., & Willett, P. (1995). An introduction to algorithmic and cognitive approaches for information retrieval. Libri, 45(3/4), 160-177. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Savage-Knepshield, P.A., & Belkin, N.J. (1999). Interaction in information retrieval: Trends over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1067-1082. [UNC libraries]
- More...
- Interview reports: Javed Mostafa (Felix); Melanie Wright, Duke University (Felix)
- Seminal article, selected by Felix: Tolman, E.C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208. [UNC libraries; also available in Sakai Resources]
Session 11: November 3, Information needs and their expression
It could be argued that the raison d'etre of the ILS profession is to bring together information that has been created with the people who need it for their own purposes. This will be the first of a series of sessions examining the processes by which this professional goal can be reached. We'll begin from the perspective of the person needing information.
- Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behaviour: An interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing & Management, 33(4), 551-572. [UNC libraries]
- Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-145. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Borlund, P. (2003). The concept of relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54(10), 913-925. [UNC libraries]
- Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- More...
November 10: ASIST annual meeting; class cancelled
Session 12: November 17, Information seeking behaviors: models and frameworks
When someone experiences an information need, what happens next? What theoretical models and frameworks can we use to anticipate people's information seeking behaviors?
- Marchionini, G. (2008). Human-information interaction research and development. Library & Information Science Research, 30(3), 165-174. [UNC libraries]
- Savolainen, R. (1993). The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 13-28. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371. [UNC libraries]
- Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60. [UNC libraries]
- Bates, M. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: a grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486. [SILS Library; also available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41-46. [ACM Digital Library]
- Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science (part 1). Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 40, 475-486 (only). [UNC libraries]
- Chatman, E. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193-206. [UNC libraries]
- Fisher, K.E., & Naumer, C.M. (2006). Information grounds: Theoretical basis and empirical findings on information flow in social settings. In Spink, A., & Cole, C. (eds.), New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Springer, 93-111. [UNC libraries, online book]
- More...
Session 13: November 24, Information seeking processes: empirical studies and methods
The processes by which people find the information they need are of interest to both practitioners and researchers in ILS. How can we study people's responses to their information needs?
- Buente, W., & Robbin, A. (2008). Trends in internet information behavior, 2000-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(11), 1743-1760. [UNC libraries]
- Rieh, S.Y. (2004). On the web at home: Information seeking and web searching in the home environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(8), 743-753. [UNC libraries]
- Vakkari, P., Pannanen, M., & Serola, S. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: longitudinal case study. Information Processing & Management, 39(3), 445-464. [UNC libraries]
- Renear, A.H., & Palmer, C.L. (2009). Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing. Science, 325(5942), 828-832. [UNC libraries, or at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/325/5942/828.pdf.
- More...
- Interview reports: Claudia Gollop (Sheryl), Brad Hemminger (Jason, Mike G.), Sandra Hughes-Hassell (Sheryl), Barbara Wildemuth (Sheryl, Felix)
Session 14: December 1, Mini-review presentations
- 2:00-2:40
- Kaitlin: Selection and Appraisal Methods in Web Archives
- Alex: Authenticity and Trust in Digital Archives
- 2:40-4:00
(including break)
- Felix: The Effect of Habituation on Banner Blindness: Analysis for Future Work
- Mike G.: How to Think in Six Dimensions: Understanding Card Sort Data
- Sheryl: Survival of the Fittest: Measuring Computer Skills in the Wild
- 4:00-4:40
- Mike B.: Study of LIS Job Market Positions Over Time
- Jason: Scientometrics 2.0: Measuring Scholarly Impact on the New Web
Session 15: December 8, Reflections on what we've learned so far
- Gallos, J.V. (1996). On becoming a scholar: One woman's journey. In Frost, P.J., & Taylor, M.S. (eds.), Rhythms of Academic Life: Personal Accounts of Careers in Academia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 11-18. [SILS reserve - LB1778.2 .R59 1996; copy of chapter in Sakai Resources]
- Lovitts, B.E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325. [UNC libraries]
- Gardner, S.K. (2008). "What's too much and what's too little?": The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350. [UNC libraries]
- More...
- Seminal article, selected by Jason: Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479. [UNC libraries]
Thursday, December 17, 5:00pm: Individual (written) mini-review due
Session 16: January 12, Social software and the information behaviors it supports
- Shirky, C. (2009). How social media can make history. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. http://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history.html.
- Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A.B. (2007). Research issues in social computing. Journal of the AIS, 8(6), article 1. (Read the first three sections, p337-343. [UNC libraries]
- Reagle, J. (2009). Wikipedia: The happy accident. interactions, 16(3), 42-45. [UNC libraries]
- Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J.A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites.ACM SIG CHI Proceedings, 865-874. [UNC libraries]
- Thelwall, M. (2008). Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(8), 1321-1330. [UNC libaries]
- More...
- Seminal article, selected by Sheryl: Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. [UNC libraries]
Session 17: January 19, Information services
How can we use what we know about people's information behaviors to design effective information services?
- Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. B. (1997). Studying the value of library and information services. Part I. Establishing a theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 527-542. [UNC libraries]
- Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 71-77. [UNC libraries]
- Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science (part 2). Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 40, 486-503 (only). [UNC libraries]
- Pomerantz, J., & Marchionini, G. (2007). The digital library as place. Journal of Documentation, 63(4), 505-533. [UNC libraries]
- Burnett, G., Jaeger, P.T., & Thompson, K.M. (2008). Normative behavior and information: The social aspects of information access. Library & Information Science Research, 30(1), 56-66. [UNC libraries]
- More...
- Interview reports: Paul Jones (Kaitlin, Jason), Jeff Pomerantz (Alex), Brian Sturm (Kaitlin)
Session 18: January 26, Information organizations and their management; Information professions and the workforce
Information activities happen within organizational settings, and many of the activities are carried out by professionals working in those organizations. In this session, we'll consider some of the organizational and staffing issues associated with the information professions.
- Gilstrap, D.L. (2009). A complex systems framework for research on leadership and organizational dynamics in academic libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 57-77. [UNC libraries, via Project Muse]
- Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organizations. California Management Review, 40(2), 96-124. [UNC libraries, via EbscoHost]
- Orlikowski, W.J., & Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145-165. [UNC libraries, via JSTOR]
- Choo, C.W., Bergeron, P., Detlor, B., & Heaton, L. (2008). Information culture and information use: An exploratory study of three organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(5), 792-804. [UNC libraries]
- More...
- Interview reports: Barbara Moran (Mike B.), José-Marie Griffiths (Sheryl), Joanne Marshall (Jason)
Session 19: February 2, Doctoral student tour, part 1; Schedule an individual appointment with the instructor, to discuss term project
- If possible, participate in i-Schools Conference, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, February 3-6, 2010
Session 20: February 9, Doctoral student tour, part 2
Session 21: February 16, Developing your own research idea; Writing a research proposal
Writing a research proposal is a critical skill that doctoral students must develop; in addition, you need to be able to manage a research project,if approved/funded. Some of these basic skills will be discussed in this session.
- Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base.
- Wildemuth, B.M. (2009). Developing a research question. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 11-20. [SILS Reserve - Z669.7 .W55 2009]
- Brause, R.S. (2000). Writing your dissertation proposal while designing your dissertation research. Writing Your Doctoral Dissertation: Invisible Rules for Success. London: Falmer, 97-110. [UNC libraries, online text]
- Robson, C. (2002). Appendix A: Writing a project proposal. In Real World Research. 2nd ed. Blackwell, 526-533. [SILS Library - H62 .R627 2002]
- Dalton, R., & Siverson, R. (1998). Gee! I've never spent $5.5 million before: The six fallacies of
NSF proposal writing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31(1), 74-76. [UNC libraries, JSTOR]
- More...
Session 22: February 23, Writing: literature reviews and other forms
- Lee, A.S. (2007). Crafting a paper for publication. Communications of the AIS, 20, article 7, 33-40. [CAIS online]
- Mingers, J. (2002). The long and winding road: Getting papers published in top journals. Communications of the AIS, 8, article 22. [CAIS online]
- Gilbert, E. (2009). Elizabeth Gilbert on nurturing creativity. TED talks. http://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_gilbert_on_genius.html.
- Syrett, K.L., & Rudner, L.M. (1996). Authorship ethics. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(1). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=1
- Clarke, R. (2009). Journal self-citation XIX: Self-plagiarism and self-citation: A practical guide based on underlying principles. Communications of the AIS, 25(Article 19), 155-164. [UNC libraries]
- More...
Session 23: March 2, Managing a research project
- Lauriol, J. (2006). Proposals for designing and controlling a doctoral research project in management sciences. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 4(1), 31-38. [UNC libraries]
- Gosling, P. (2006). Mastering Your PhD: Survival and Success in the Doctoral Years and Beyond. Berlin: Springer. [Davis - LB2386 .G67 2006; also available as an e-book]
- Chapter 3, Setting goals and objectives, p11-19
- Chapter 6, Charting your progress month by month, p37-42
- Chapter 13, Celebrate your success, p101-104
- More...
March 9: No class (spring break)
Session 24: March 16, Status reports on final projects
Session 25: March 23, Collaboration in research; Interdisciplinary research issues
Most social science research today is conducted in collaborative teams. What's the most effective way to identify potential collaborators? What skills are needed to collaborate successfully?
Bates (1999) positioned ILS as a meta-discipline, and it's certainly true that ILS researchers often collaborate with scholars from other disciplines. Why is interdisciplinary research important and what are its key characteristics?
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. [UNC libraries]
- Chua, A.Y.K., & Yang, C.C. (2008). The shift toward multi-disciplinarity in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(13), 2156-2170. [UNC libraries]
- Reychav, I., & Te'eni, D. (2009). Knowledge exchange in the shrines of knowledge: The "how's" and "where's" of knowledge sharing processes. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1266-1277. [UNC libraries]
- Cronin, B. (2004). Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(6), 557-560. [UNC libraries]
- Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34(2), 201-216. [UNC libraries]
- More...
Session 26: March 30, Research ethics; Research with human subjects
Particular issues arise when your research involves human subjects/participants. this session will cover research ethics generally and, more specifically, the ethical issues associated with working with human subjects.
Session 27: April 6, Reviewing the work of others
Scholarly communication, particularly the peer reviewing process, depends upon the quality of the reviews that scholars provide for each other. Even more important than their advice to editors about whether an article should be accepted is the reviewer's advice to the author about how to improve the work.
- Edwards, P.M. (2007). Developing as a writer: Refereeing manuscripts for peer-reviewed LIS journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68(10): 630-631. [Available online]
- Lepak, D. (2009). Editor's comments: What is good reviewing? Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 375-381. [UNC libraries]
- Romanelli, E. (1996). Becoming a reviewer: Lessons somewhat painfully learned. In Frost, P., & Taylor, M. S. (eds.), Rhythms of Academic Life: Personal Accounts of Careers in Academia. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 263-267. [Available via Course Tools: Resources on class Sakai site]
- More...
April 13: No class; SIG CHI; prepare for presentations
Session 28: April 20, Final presentations
Each class member's final product will be discussed.
Session 29: April 27, Year-end review: What have you learned?
What have you learned? Re-read the description of your interests that you posted to the class list last August. Have they changed? In what way? What research opportunities and hot topics interest you? How do you want to contribute to them in the next year? During the rest of your doctoral studies? Afterwards? What do you need to learn to accomplish these goals?
May 5, noon: Final product due
Syllabus / Assignments / Sakai class site
The INLS 881-882 website, UNC-CH, 2009-2010, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Address all comments and questions to Barbara M. Wildemuth at wildem@ils.unc.edu.
This page was last modified on November 25, 2009, by Barbara M. Wildemuth.